This feature changed too much for Print Merge.

They did not discovery Corel's speed for those jobs.Ī little but very powerfull new feature of X4 is 'Merge to New Document'. There is a lot of Digital Press Company who works variable data jobs and they are useing indesign their jobs generally. Indesign support advanced variable data processing natively while CorelDRAW support advanced variable data processing by the third party plugin.ĬorelDRAW's main competitor is Adobe Illustrator but should not be ignored as a competitor Indesign. But there is a little different between CorelDRAW and Adobe INDESIGN about Variable Data Process. Yes, MonsterMerge powerfull macro for CorelDRAW, I respect and support Jeff's and other macromonster author's macros. > Intel Q6600 Processor, 3 GB RAM, Gigabyte GA-P35C-DS3R Mainboard, Win > Extra Options No Extra Options Disable 'Generate Overset Text Report > Native File Size Merged Document 5,58 mb 91,5 mb > ReOpen File After Save and Close 26 sec 3 sec > Total Time For Native File Archiving 102 sec 503 sec > Close File After Merge (Without Save) 2 sec 64 sec > Total Time For PrintReady PDF File 80 sec 198 sec > Print Merge / Data Merge Process 60 sec 155 sec > CorelDRAW's Print Merge must be develop. CorelDRAW 2,47 X faster adobe indesign this project. > I compared CorelDRAW's Print Merge with Adobe Indesign Data Merge same What type of development are you wanting to see? Mistakes are the client's fault and not mine. Takes just a few minutes instead of hours. Then I can just pull up my pages and send each to the plotter orĬNC router. My substrate size such as 4' x 8' or 30' x 10') and have it save to aĬDR. I use MonsterMerge to impose the signs onto unusual page sizes (usually Lay out hundreds of signs in seconds is extremely useful.

I'm a signmaker by profession so the ability to MonsterMerge in conjunction with Corel's print merge to create some

I've been very impressed with Corel's print merge.

Corel vs adobe indesign